Skip to main content

Sample · illustrative only

SEO Checker sample report

Example output for a mid-market B2B homepage. Not a real audited domain. Real reports include evidence and a downloadable PDF.

LoudScale · Sample Report
PDF · 8 PAGES
Model · seo-v2-2026-07Evidence coverage · 71%Confidence · medium

acme-growth.example.com

Mid-market B2B services · single public HTML inspection

Coverage

What was measurable

  • Title, meta, headings
    92%
  • Structured data (JSON-LD)
    68%
  • Performance proxies (HTML)
    55%
  • E-E-A-T signals
    38%
  • Answer extractability
    44%

Limits

What this score does not measure

  • Google rankings, search traffic, or click data.
  • Backlink profile, internal PageRank, or authority.
  • Field Core Web Vitals from real users (CrUX).
  • Robots.txt crawl or Search Console data.

Top opportunities

Prioritized next actions

  1. 01

    Add clear author / organization provenance

    Author bylines, About, Contact, and editorial policy signals are missing or hidden from crawlers.

    → Surface About + author markup on commercial pages

  2. 02

    Strengthen title ↔ H1 alignment around the primary offer entity

    Title and H1 mention different entities than the page actually offers. Bots struggle to align intent.

    → Match the page's primary offer entity in title, H1, intro

  3. 03

    Validate JSON-LD against visible content

    Schema is present but the @type and required properties don't match what the page actually shows.

    → Run Schema.org validator + manual visible-content check

Limitations

  • Single-page HTML — not a full-site crawl.
  • No rankings, backlinks, CRM, or analytics.
  • Performance uses HTML proxies, not field CWV.
  • Grade scale matches other LoudScale diagnostics (A rare; no A+).

Illustrative sample · not a real audited domain