Skip to main content

Sample · illustrative only

Content architecture sample

Example output after a capped multi-page crawl: taxonomy coverage, dedicated vs weak vs missing topics, and recommended pages to create.

LoudScale report

brightline.example.com

Crawl 22 pages · 148 sitemap URLs · growth taxonomy

  • Model · cga-v3-crawl
  • 22 pages fetched
  • Sitemap used

Architecture score

52/100

Grade D

Dedicated service + blog pages found. Comparison, proof, and pricing still missing after crawl.

Dedicated vs weak vs missing

  • Services / productsDedicated
  • Blog / resourcesDedicated
  • About / companyDedicated
  • Contact / demoWeak
  • Use cases / industriesWeak
  • Comparison / alternativesMissing
  • Proof (case studies)Missing
  • Pricing / plansMissing

Highest-leverage URLs to create

  • /case-studies/Customer results hub
  • /pricing/Plans & packaging
  • /compare/Vs alternatives
  • /use-cases/ICP / industry pages

What to do first

  1. 01

    Ship a proof hub

    No case-study or customers path in crawl or sitemap seeds buyers and answer engines lack attributable results.

    Publish /case-studies/ with 2–3 real outcomes and link it from primary nav

  2. 02

    Clarify commercial packaging

    Pricing/plans URLs were not found in the crawl budget.

    Add /pricing/ or a clear “get a quote” page linked from the homepage CTA

  3. 03

    Add comparison coverage

    No /vs or /compare routes detected among crawled or sitemap-prioritized URLs.

    Create one fair comparison page for the most common alternative

What this report does not measure

  • Crawl is capped (~36 HTML pages) not a full site mirror.
  • Not keyword-volume or Search Console data.
  • Missing in crawl ≠ guaranteed absence deeper in the site.
  • Scores architecture presence, not content quality depth.